Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eric's avatar

Sports and modern day media have a strange relationship. Striking the balance between respecting athletes’ emotional space and fan interest and growing the game is hard. Sometimes, as you point out, Jeff, there’s not enough access; sometimes – in my opinion – there’s too much, and in the wrong places. For example, I would love to see in-game sideline interviews of players be banished somewhere never to be conducted again. It’s absurd to ask a sweaty, breathless athlete (or pretty much anyone) to analyze and explain their emotional processes or “how they find it within themselves to (do whatever).” I’ve yet to come away feeling I’ve learned anything useful, or deepened my connection to the sport from those interviews. And talking to coaches – while they’re trying to actually… coach - strikes me as beyond ridiculous. I certainly value the work that you, and your colleagues do, Jeff. Yet, I can also imagine I’d find it hard to decompress quickly enough to give a useful postgame interview after a tough loss. I wish I had a proactive solution that is better than the current approach of making rules, breaking those rules and then getting fined for it. Sadly, I don’t have one. I hope you’ll keep up the excellent work, even though the circumstances aren’t helping. Your work matters.

Steve's avatar

Good discussion. I understand the WNBA’s concerns but the more fans hear the players the more the support grows. Nobody wants to talk to the press after a tough loss or playoff loss but respect for a player or team is probably enhanced if players and coaches are responsive even if the game results are below expectations.

Hearing Liberty coach Sandy say husband instead of assistant coach during an interview was funny and seeing Sabrina come to life during that exchange was hilarious. That adds more value than anything the marketing group can create.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?