Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ryan's avatar

I like the two year rule, as it does encourage teams to be more competitive instead of playing for the next season’s draft. One year of bottoming out can be accepted, two years and you could end up doing real damage to your brand and to your fanbase (and possibly your players).

A savvy GM has more tools than just the tank. A good scouting department can find great players outside of the #1 pick. Just look at some of the west coast nfl teams for examples on how to build a championship roster without bottoming out (What team just won the Super Bowl without ever being bad enough to earn a top 5 pick?).

Cole Helwig's avatar

We need the fire and the tempo to be winning their games this year. This year I have been pretty ok with the losses, as I know they are expected and it will help our draft, but I'll be pretty upset if we get the 6th pick. It is interesting you talk about the next draft, because thats the Sarah strong, mikaylah blakes, and jaloni cambridge, and olivia olson draft class, and any of those players would greatly benefit our team. I think next year we obviously try to be competitive and if we make the playoffs, then great, but if we miss them, it's not all bad. One thing to note though, is that if we add 2 more lottery picks in addition to dom, awa, and flaujae, that core will get super expensive down the line, and probably won't be able to keep all five players unless someone takes a pay cut

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?